The Two Faces of Google

Friday, 28 May 2010


At Berkeley University four years ago, Sergey Brin, the co founder of Google, stood up in front of a room full of students and said: “in our lifetime everyone may have tools of equal power”. Giving a short lecture before taking questions from the audience, a casual and laid back Brin took the time to proclaim his love for mathematics and computers before touching upon the inspiration behind the formation of Google. “Technology,” he told the students, “is an inherent democratiser.”

He talked about algorithms, cracking the “Chinese market” and the Google brand; about the importance of being user friendly and also law abiding – but at no point did he address the incongruence between his idealised vision of Google, presented to the Berkley students, and the reality of its day to day existence.

Brin, like Google, talks the talk but does not walk the walk. One of Google’s core principles is “democracy on the web works”, but democracy does not entail being complicit in the repression of freedom of speech, like Google has been in China. Brin was certainly right about the capacity internet technology has to be an ‘inherent democratiser’; but this is reliant heavily upon how companies such as Google handle the power that they wield. Collecting ‘data logs’ that store the search habits of every unique user, and doing so without the explicit consent of that user, is an abuse of this power – and yes, again, Google is guilty as charged.

The two faces of Google have, though, been exposed for all to see in recent weeks and months. Their indiscriminate rampage against an array of popular music bloggers – labeled aptly as “music blogocide 2010” – whereby they deleted entire blogs on a whim as a result of complaints generated in some cases by ‘bots’, is exemplar of the increasingly callous behaviour of a company that is rapidly becoming more Mr. Hyde than it is Dr. Jekyll.

Highly regarded Scottish blog, the Pop Cop, was their most recent victim. “We've been forced to remove your blog… Thank you for your understanding” wrote Google’s Blogger.com team in a laconic email issued to the Pop Cop – their overly bureaucratic, rigidly undemocratic and highly automated copyright complaints procedure felling yet another innocent bystander in a blind and pointless war spearheaded by a greed-crazed music industry clutching at straws. Brin can talk all day about “equal power”, but it’s crystal clear that the internet is still far from a level playing field.

The Pop Cop’s creator, Jason, is now campaigning to have his blog reinstated, but Google has so far ignored all of his attempts to contact them. Three years worth of work wiped in an instant, with no room for recourse, no space for appeal. It’s little surprise then that Jason is dubious about starting another blog. “It really is 50-50 at the moment whether I blog elsewhere or not”, he told the Skinny. “If I do, I certainly won't use Blogger.”

A version of this article appears at: http://www.theskinny.co.uk/blog/2-the-skinny-blog/433-a-skinny-take-the-two-faces-of-google

The Shining Face of David Cameron

Friday, 14 May 2010


It was just after 8.30pm on Tuesday May 11th 2010 when David Cameron, leader of the British Conservative party, entered the famous door of 10 Downing Street as the first Tory Prime Minister in fourteen years. Arriving chauffer driven in a silver Jaguar, he was greeted by a large crowd who had gathered to witness the weird and historic spectacle; and as they jeered and screamed and hissed in the distance he, seemingly unfazed, coolly delivered his first speech as Prime Minister, his wife standing by his side.

“Her Majesty the Queen has asked me to form a new government and I have accepted” Cameron announced to the world’s media outside his new home, his face shining like a mirror in the sun. “I came into politics because I love this country,” he proclaimed, “And I want to help try and build a more responsible society here in Britain.”

The speech predictably regurgitated the themes that dominated the Tories’ election campaign, centering heavily on rhetoric, veiled warnings and assertions. “Real change” Cameron said, “is when everyone pulls together, comes together, works together”. But the reality, of course, is that the Conservatives do not represent change at all: they represent regression – the same old stagnant mantra of “responsibility… family… work”. This is not new – it is the sound of history repeating itself, the sound of the same teeth-grindingly deafening crud that the Tories, under whatever guise, have been pedaling under various banners for decades.

“The quality of our lives will depend upon how much each of us is prepared to take responsibility for ourselves” said Thatcher in 1987. In 1998 Iain Duncan Smith told a Tory Party Conference how important it was to "strengthen the institution of the family"; and in 2005 Michael Howard announced in a Tory election broadcast that true British people “work hard, play by the rules and take responsibility for themselves and their families.”

So when Cameron talks about "real change", keep in mind that what he really means is "same old story". He talks with conviction about “a new politics”, and he might be the youngest Prime Minister to have been elected since Lord Liverpool in 1812, but he’s up to the same old tricks. Manipulation; spin; rhetoric; demagoguery – his face shines, his mouth moves and his words deceive.

The new government might be a partial coalition, but be under no illusions: the Tories are now at the helm of Great Britain and this is bad news for anybody not rich, entrepreneurial, British born or reactionary. Egalitarian humanity has just taken a kick in the teeth – and further beatings are impending. Cameron will be smiling tonight, but the eyes of hope are weeping.

R.J. Gallagher - 11.05.10


A version of this article appears at: http://www.theskinny.co.uk/blog/2-the-skinny-blog/417-a-skinny-take-the-shining-face-of-david-cameron